RICHARD L. W. CLARKE


 

 

 

LITS2002 POETRY II: ROMANTICS AND VICTORIANS

EXAM ADVICE

See also Recommended Readings.

  • In the exam, there will be SIX questions in all.

  • You are required to answer TWO questions.

  • In each answer, you should refer to the work of TWO poets;

  • TWO questions will test your understanding of the development of nineteenth century poetry as a whole and its relationship to both what came before and what followed it (this is the topic which I often refer to as 'Literary History (the Tradition) / Intertextuality / Canonicity' in the lectures).  Relevant questions in this regard include:

    • what does the term 'Romantic' poetry mean?  Which poets fall under this rubric?

    • how do the Romantics conceptualise poetry (poetry = a form of self-expression) and how is this conception of poetry similar to and/or different from that of Neo-classical poets and theorists like Alexander Pope?

    • Is 'Romanticism' a single, united phenomenon or a multiplicitous, diverse one?  Might it be better to think in terms of many 'Romanticisms'?

    • what does the term 'Victorian' poetry mean?  Which poets fall under this rubric?

    • how do the Victorians conceptualise poetry and how is this conception of poetry similar to and/or different from that of the Romantic poets and theorists?

    • Is 'Victorianism' a single, united phenomenon or a multiplicitous, diverse one? 

    • are there continuities which link Romantic and Victorian poetry?  If so, are these formal?  Thematic?

    • are there also discontinuities which serve to distinguish Romantic from Victorian poetry?

  • ONE question will address those inter-related Metaphysical/Epistemological/Linguistic/Religious issues with which almost all nineteenth-century poets seem to be preoccupied.  Relevant questions in this regard include:

    • Being: what truth-claims do any of these poems make about the nature of reality?

      • is the material world all there is or is there a spiritual dimension to existence?

      • is there a God?  If so, what form does he take?  What is the nature of his relationship to his creation?  Can one discern his presence in his handiwork (nature)?

      • Human Being: what truth-claims do any of the poems you have read make about the nature of human identity? 

        • are we merely physical bodies or is there another spiritual dimension (a soul) to us? 

        • what is our relationship to God?  Are we his servants?  Are we part of God?

        • what relation is there between the sense we have of our selves and our knowledge of the external world?

      • Religion: which contemporaneous intellectual developments (the rise to prominence of the natural sciences, Darwinism, etc.) conspired to undermine Europeans' faith is a meaningful universe?

    • Knowledge / Language: do these poems ever discuss the limits, if any, to human knowledge (about objective reality?  about the self?)?

      • is it possible for a human being to know the truth about reality?  Are there any impediments to such knowledge?  What roles does language and, by extension, poetry play in the production of such knowledge?

      • is it possible for a human being to know the truth about him/herself?  Are there any impediments to such knowledge?  What roles does language and, by extension, poetry play in the production of such knowledge?

  • ONE question will address Socio-Political issues.  Relevant questions in this regard include:

    • is it fair to accuse Romantic and/or Victorian poetry of 'escapism'?  In other words, does either ever abandon abstract philosophical musings in order to address more worldly (i.e. economic/social/political) concerns such as poverty, injustice, oppression?

    • Marx once said that the point is not merely to interpret the world, as philosophers do, but to change it.  Are Romantic and/or Victorian poets content with the status quo?  Do they ever see the need for change and, if so, what tools do they employ (direct criticism, satire, etc.)?

  • ONE question will address the topic of Literary Form, i.e. the form or structure of Romantic and Victorian poetry.  Relevant questions in this regard include:

    • what genres do the Romantics make use of?  What are the precise features of these genres?

    • is it possible to identify a common structure to any / all Romantic poems? 

    • what is the relationship between the form of a Romantic poem (its use of figurative language, its development, etc.) and its content or subject-matter (i.e. what they are ostensibly about)?

    • what genres do the Victorians make use of?  What are the precise features of these genres?

    • is it possible to identify a common structure to any / all Victorian poems?

    • what is the relationship between the form of a Victorian poem (its use of figurative language, its development, etc.) and its content or subject-matter (i.e. what they are ostensibly about)?

    • in what ways does the form and content of Romantic and/or Victorian poetry anticipate more recent poetry (e.g. the Modernism of an Eliot or a Yeats)?

  • ONE question will address the emergence of poetry by African Americans (e.g. by Paul Lawrence Dunbar) and other non-Europeans / non-whites during the nineteenth century.  Relevant questions in this regard include:

    • to what degree are such poets influenced by Romantic and/or Victorian poetry?

    • to what degree, on the other hand, do they respond to different imperatives and thus strike a different note?

 

This site was last updated: February 03, 2011

Please direct all queries
HERE

 

Philosophy's Other: Theory on the Web

↑ Grab this Headline Animator